Communication#
The single highest-leverage skill for any engineer. Clear communication reduces bugs, prevents rework, accelerates decisions, and builds trust. Poor communication does the opposite — at scale.
Written Communication#
Most engineering communication is written: Slack messages, emails, pull request descriptions, design documents, tickets, and documentation. Written words persist, get forwarded, and are read without your tone of voice for context.
The Pyramid Principle#
Lead with the conclusion, then provide supporting details. Busy readers need the answer first.
| Approach | Example |
|---|---|
| ❌ Bottom-up | “I investigated the timeout issue, looked at logs, checked the database, ran some queries, and eventually found that the connection pool is exhausted because…” |
| ✅ Top-down | “The timeouts are caused by connection pool exhaustion. Here’s what I found and my recommended fix…” |
Pull Request Descriptions#
Your PR description is a communication tool, not a formality.
| Element | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Summary | What and why (1-2 sentences) | “Adds retry logic to the payment gateway client to handle transient 503 errors” |
| Context | Why now, what triggered this | “We saw 47 failed payments last week due to gateway instability” |
| Approach | How you solved it and alternatives considered | “Exponential backoff with 3 retries. Considered circuit breaker but deemed it overkill for now” |
| Testing | How you verified it works | “Unit tests for retry logic. Manually tested with network interruption” |
| Risks | What could go wrong | “Retries add latency to the payment flow — max 6s additional in worst case” |
Email and Slack#
- Subject lines are headlines — make them scannable: “Decision needed: API versioning strategy by Friday”
- One message, one topic — don’t bury a question inside a status update
- Use threads — keep conversations findable
- Respect async — don’t expect instant replies. Provide full context so the reader can respond without follow-up questions
Technical Documentation#
Good docs answer: What is this? Why does it exist? How do I use it? What are the gotchas?
flowchart LR
A[Reader arrives] --> B{What do they need?}
B -->|Quick answer| C[README / Quick Start]
B -->|Deep understanding| D[Architecture Doc]
B -->|How to do X| E[How-To Guide]
B -->|Something broke| F[Troubleshooting]Verbal Communication#
Meetings and Presentations#
- State your point first, then elaborate — same pyramid principle as writing
- Use silence — pause after making a point. Let it land.
- Check understanding — “Does that make sense?” is weak. Try “What questions do you have?” or “Can you summarise what we agreed?”
- Adapt your depth — a 30-second answer is often better than a 5-minute one
Explaining Technical Concepts#
| Audience | Adjust |
|---|---|
| Fellow engineers (same domain) | Use precise terminology. Skip basics. Focus on the novel part. |
| Engineers (different domain) | Explain domain-specific terms. Use analogies to their domain. |
| Product/Design | Focus on behaviour and impact. Skip implementation details unless asked. |
| Executives | Lead with business impact. One sentence of how. No jargon. |
The Curse of Knowledge#
Once you understand something deeply, it becomes hard to remember what it was like not to know it. Fight this by:
- Defining acronyms on first use
- Using concrete examples before abstract principles
- Asking “what level of detail is helpful here?” before diving in
- Watching for glazed eyes or polite nodding
Active Listening#
Listening is not waiting for your turn to talk.
| Level | Behaviour | Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Downloading | Hearing words while thinking about your response | Looking away, interrupting, “yeah but…” |
| Factual | Listening for data and facts | Noting specifics, asking clarifying questions |
| Empathic | Listening for feelings and intent behind words | “It sounds like you’re frustrated by…” |
| Generative | Listening for what’s not being said | “What would you do if there were no constraints?” |
Practical Techniques#
- Paraphrase — “So what you’re saying is…” (confirms understanding, shows respect)
- Ask before solving — “Do you want me to help fix this, or do you just need to vent?”
- Silence after questions — count to 5 before filling the gap. Let them think.
- Take notes — it forces attention and signals respect
Audience Awareness#
Every communication has an audience. The same information needs different framing depending on who’s receiving it.
flowchart TD
A[Information to communicate] --> B{Who is the audience?}
B -->|Technical peer| C[Precise, detailed, assumes context]
B -->|Cross-functional partner| D[Focus on interfaces and impact]
B -->|Manager/Lead| E[Status, risks, decisions needed]
B -->|Executive| F[Business outcome, one-liner]Matching Communication to Context#
| Context | Optimise for | Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Incident response | Speed, clarity, actions | Blame, speculation, jargon |
| Design review | Options, trade-offs, questions | Premature commitment, ego |
| Sprint planning | Scope clarity, risks, estimates | Vagueness, over-commitment |
| 1:1 with manager | Honesty, blockers, growth | Hiding problems, only good news |
| Cross-team request | Context, urgency, what you need from them | Assuming they know your project |
Technical vs Non-Technical Communication#
The ability to translate between technical and business language is a career accelerator.
| Technical framing | Business framing |
|---|---|
| “We need to refactor the authentication module” | “Our login system is fragile — one more feature risks breaking it for all users” |
| “The database query is O(n²)” | “Page load will get noticeably slower as we add more customers” |
| “We should add integration tests” | “We can catch bugs before they reach customers, reducing support tickets” |
| “There’s technical debt in the payment service” | “Our ability to ship payment features safely is slowing down” |
The pattern: translate implementation details into impact on users, revenue, or speed.
Key Takeaways#
- Lead with the conclusion — readers and listeners are busy
- Match depth and vocabulary to your audience
- Written communication is permanent — invest in clarity
- Listening is an active skill that builds trust and surfaces better information
- The ability to translate between technical and business language makes you invaluable
- Every PR, email, and message is practice — treat them as communication reps